Author: Justin Mckibben
Many months back, when President Trump was still on the campaign trail, he was asked about the opioid epidemic in America during a Q&A in Ohio. He said the solution was about cutting it off at the source through the southern border. President Trump continues this narrative in a more recent solo press conference, suggesting the United States is becoming a “drug infested nation,” and he added,
“Drugs are becoming cheaper than candy bars.”
So what is President Trump’s plan to fight addiction, and will it help addicts?
President Trump on Cartels
By now we all know President Trump believes there is a direct correlation between the drug epidemic in America and what he calls an epidemic of illegal immigration. In the past he has pointed to the infamous border wall as the answer to cutting off the heroin trade into America, which he seems to believe is the primary source of the problem. During his press conference he adds,
“We’ve ordered the Department of Homeland Security and Justice to coordinate on a plan to destroy criminal cartels coming into the United States with drugs,”
President Trump went on to say,
“We have begun a nationwide effort to remove criminal aliens, gang members, drug dealers and others who pose a threat to public safety.”
To be fair, we must acknowledge the relevance of cartels in the drug trade. Since the 90’s some statistics show that the primary supplier of heroin to North America is pretty consistently Latin America and Mexico.
However, to believe that Mexican cartels are the only element of the opioid epidemic is a mistake we can’t afford to make. And blaming an entire country for drug dealers and gangs is a bit out of step with the history of drugs and gang violence in America. While it cannot be denied that Mexican cartels have a role in all this, solving the addiction problem is a lot bigger than that. Besides the fact that heroin is not only from Mexico, heroin is definitely not the only problem.
President Trump on China
For example, what do you know about fentanyl? That is, the incredibly dangerous opiate that has created such a overwhelming panic as a result of steep spikes in overdoses and deaths. Did you know it originates from Chinese suppliers?
According to some lobbyists, there are some clues that could imply President Trump plans to prosecute drug traffickers and close shipping loopholes that include drugs coming in from China and other areas.
So far, however, there isn’t much mention out there about these ideas. It seems the majority of the statements being made openly are singling out Mexico. It might be time to talk more on these other areas they plan on addressing. There is some value to stopping these dangerous drugs from getting here, but we also have plenty of problems here already.
President Trump on Opioid Epidemic
President Trump did release details during his campaign about his intentions for taking on the opioid epidemic, stating he plans to:
- Increase Naloxone access- the opiate overdose medication
- Encourage state and local governments to provide treatment options
- Speed FDA approval for abuse-deterrent painkillers
Yet some people are concerned because there hasn’t been much more talk about this since late in the campaign trail. President Trump has referenced a move to expand access to drug courts and raise the cap on how many patients that doctors can prescribe medication-assisted treatments. These may be very effective strategies for providing multiple opportunities for exposing addicts to recovery. But we aren’t hearing enough about those either. When the subject comes up, we should hope for more accurate information to know if addicts will get this help, instead of hearing about immigration.
Again, many still want the President to talk more openly about the contribution made by Big Pharma and prescription drugs to the issue, specifically concerning the opiate epidemic. We can only blame so much of our problems on outside influence. We have to hold our own drug companies accountable.
President Trump and Big Pharma
Trump did say throughout his campaign he would be fighting the Big Pharma companies in order to get rid of outrageous price-gouging on medications. He made a statement at one point that,
“Pharma, pharma has a lot of lobbies and a lot of lobbyists and a lot of power and there’s very little bidding on drugs,”
“We’re the largest buyer of drugs in the world and yet we don’t bid properly and we’re going to start bidding and we’re going to save billions of dollars.”
This much isn’t off base. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, drug companies and their industry allies spent more than $186 million lobbying for their interests in a year, and $1.12 billion since 2012.
Yet, the Republican Party did a great deal in 2003 under President George W. Bush to prevent federal government from interfering in negotiations between drug companies and pharmacies that participate in taxpayer-funded Medicare Plan D prescription drug benefits.
Hopefully, having a Republican Congress that isn’t constantly at odds with their President will help things move along easier; especially concerning healthcare reforms. So beyond making drugs cheaper, the question becomes what can we do about preventing dangerous and addictive drugs from getting even more out of control.
ACA and CARA
With healthcare reform, many addiction recovery advocates insist that the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA) should be a priority. Many say the CARA is the most significant federal legislation pertaining to addiction in years. Still, it does not include a specific allowance of funding for the programs it has created.
Once CARA is funded, more programs will be put in place to help fight addiction. Without the funds it is a Cadillac with no engine or wheels.
Then there is the major point President Trump ran on; repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This action could eliminate coverage for many Americans in recovery who had previously been uninsured. Specifically, if the government repeals the ACA without a plan to replace it or to maintain coverage for those depending on it. If President Trump and the GOP come up with a program to replace it, we may still avoid this tragedy. Still, as it stands, the idea makes plenty of people nervous.
For instance, Medicaid, the federal-state insurance for low-income people, payed for about $60 billion worth of mental health services in 2014. That assistance is now expected to shrink as a result of healthcare reforms under President Trump.
After Republicans have pledged to make some major cuts in federal spending, there is still hope out there that agencies like the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) would not see their funding severed. This would potentially be another devastating blow to the efforts already in place to battle addiction in America. Will President Trump defend these programs to help addicts?
What Will Help?
Some of the ideas this administration mentions do have some hope behind them. My opinion, we might want to hear more about the expansion of treatment options and access to life-saving resources. The strong focus on border control and President Trump’s cries for “law and order” and aggressive investigations sound extremely reminiscent of the War on Drugs that failed so many families and people suffering.
As the former drug czar Michael Botticelli stated,
“Any drug policy that’s going to be effective has got to be based on science and research,”
So President Trump has his work cut out for him, but some still say we need to see more being done with healthcare and providing resources. More advocates want to hear plans on healing people; on how we plan to save lives. Assure people by taking real action to show they will not be without insurance or treatment.
So this does not mean to say the President’s plans are not good. Essentially, we just want to hear more about them besides borders. If his plans do involve expanding current resources, and if the ACA is effectively replaced; if we see adequate funding appropriated for the CARA and if we make this about more than just immigrants and law enforcement, then the plan could make a difference. So far only time will tell.
Drug abuse and addiction is a devastating and deadly disease, and providing effective and compassionate treatment makes a lifelong difference. If you or someone you love is struggling with substance abuse or addiction, think about who you want to be working with to find a real solution. Please call toll-free now.
CALL NOW 1-800-951-6135
(This content is being used for illustrative purposes only; any person depicted in the content is a model)
Author: Justin Mckibben
In 2008 the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act passed. Ever since then health insurers and employers have progressed toward improving coverage for mental health and substance abuse issues. One step in the new direction includes insurance plans no longer charging higher copays or separate deductibles for mental health care, but beyond that there is more to be done.
In March President Obama announced the establishment of a task force focused on further studying and improving the scope of coverage for mental health to ensure that patients with mental illness and addiction would not face discrimination in their health care.
The task force recently submitted a report in which they have made a series of recommendations. Part of this initiative called for $9.3 million in funding to improve enforcement of the federal parity law. Taking a closer look at the report, this is important news for those trying to find help.
The Task Force Report
As part of the report, the task force authors touch on how the lack of effective treatment impacts more than just the costs of treatment and actually creates more issues and more costs down the road. The report states:
“These disorders affect society in ways that go beyond the direct cost of care. Without effective treatment, people with these health conditions may find it difficult to find or maintain a job, may be less able to pursue education and training opportunities, may require more social support services, and are more likely to have their housing stability threatened.”
This is the truth. People who fail to receive quality care for substance abuse and addiction often end up facing multiple hurdles later on. The fact is there are significant problems with the parity law. But some are probably asking, what is parity and what does it mean for substance abuse?
Parity Law Explained
Mental health parity means equal treatment of mental health and substance abuse disorders in insurance plans. When an insurance plan has parity, it means you should get the same benefits for mental health or addiction treatment as you do for other chronic conditions.
For example: If your insurance plan provides unlimited doctor visits for diabetes, they must also offer unlimited visits for depression or schizophrenia.
However, parity makes no guarantee for quality of coverage. Many would argue that “equal” coverage does not translate to “good” coverage. So if your health insurance is limited, your mental health coverage is also limited.
The rules of parity law can be a little confusing, and there are some big problems with regulation.
Task Force Recommendations
In order to get a comprehensive idea of how to address problems with parity, the task force reached out to several sources. They received 1,161 public comments from:
- State regulators
Based on the findings, the task force has enacted some new strategies to work toward move effective parity regulation. Some of these include:
- The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is awarding $9.3 million to states to help enforce parity protections.
- A new government website will help consumers identify the right agency to assist with parity complaints and appeals.
- A new consumer guide to help patients, families and providers understand their rights and look into whether they have experienced a parity violation.
- The Department of Labor will report each year on investigations into violations.
The federal task force also recommended the government increase its aptitude to audit health plans for parity compliance. Also they suggest the same for the Department of Labor when assessing civil monetary penalties for violations.
Opinions on Parity Plans
Former congressman Patrick Kennedy is one of the authors of the 2008 parity law. After examining the task force’s report he said the actions were a step in the right direction, but much of it still places the burden of real action on the patients. Kennedy insisted that the next administration will need to be vigilant in enforcing the parity law.
Both the America’s Health Insurance Plans and the American Psychiatric Association showed support for the report and its recommendations.
Benjamin Miller, director of the health policy center at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, has an even more direct stance on the matter. Miller says,
“Separate is not equal — mental health is core to health. People do not see themselves as a disease or a select health benefit, but rather a person who has needs. Benefits and payments should follow the person, address their needs, and address the whole of their health.”
Miller’s idea is that if we want the treatment coverage to be absolutely equal, why not just eliminate any borders of distinction?
What does it all mean?
Essentially, the federal task force is fighting to assure that insurance coverage for mental health and substance abuse be more available and more strictly enforced. At the end of the day, the government realizes that allowing insurance companies to skimp on the bill when it comes to treating these kinds of disorders is not tolerable, and that people should be made more aware of their rights to coverage.
State and federal laws may also be different in regards to protection of parity. People should be educated on how this affects them and how to make sure their insurance providers are offering them the quality and equality of care they’re entitled to.
People struggling with substance abuse and addiction deserve comprehensive and compassionate treatment, and these actions are an important step towards making treatment more available.
Substance abuse should be getting the attention is deserves. Hopefully the discussion on drug policies will gain priority in the upcoming months. If you or someone you love is struggling with substance abuse or addiction, please call toll-free now.
CALL NOW 1-800-951-6135
Author: Justin Mckibben
For those who don’t know, if someone relies on Medicaid to provide them with the coverage they need for healthcare, then for years now their only option when it comes to getting treatment for drug or alcohol addiction was almost always to depend solely on money from state and local sources. Because of this, a lot of people out there struggling with addiction have not been getting the treatment they needed.
The huge news coming over the wire now is there is now hope for a histrionic shift as the federal government is considering making a contribution to providing treatment funding for those who desperately need it but lack the coverage.
A new proposition would have the agency that governs Medicaid covering 15 days of inpatient drug and alcohol treatment per month for anyone enrolled in a Medicaid managed care plan.
Is this enough time?
Now the big debate being brought out here is that this isn’t nearly enough time for people suffering from substance abuse and addiction to actually make progress that can sustain longevity. The question becomes- is 15 days of treatment paid for by Medicaid enough?
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, in its guide to drug addiction treatment:
Individuals progress through drug addiction treatment at various rates, so there is no predetermined length of treatment. However, research has shown unequivocally that good outcomes are contingent on adequate treatment length.
A lot of people who have experienced drug and alcohol treatment can tell you that 15 days is barely a drop in the bucket. A lot of residential inpatient treatment programs last between 30 and 90 days, and some long term treatments last for months at a time… and people still struggle sometimes after completing some of these programs.
The hidden element here is also how active and willing an individual is to actually participate and follow through with a recovery plan… lets just get that out there too.
At any rate, a professor at Boston University’s Clinical Addiction research unit, Dr. Jeffrey Samet, stated the funding for research that gets at the optimal length of an inpatient stay, in terms of effectiveness, has been slim so there isn’t extensive data. With the lack of good data, private insurance plans are ambiguous and can have a firm contrast in terms of how many inpatient days they will cover.
So while it may not be the most documented issue facing addiction treatment, it definitely makes sense to assume the more time you can dedicate to healing and learning in a safe environment is better, in my experience, for long lasting recovery… but it is still no guarantee.
It’s something to think about…
While some would say 15 days is not enough to really make a difference, every little bit counts toward changing lives. In my personal opinion I think it’s important to be grateful that it’s a new opportunity for some, especially since Medicaid hasn’t funded residential treatment programs at all up until now.
15 days may not change everything… but then again it might. It’s something to think about.
Cindy Mann, a former top administrator at the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which governs Medicaid, stated:
“Maybe it’s half a loaf for someone who needs 30 days. But it’s half a loaf of new federal dollars that could be available.”
Medicaid will start covering at least some inpatient treatment, which is a big step in the right direction. Experts also insist that doctors and patients should always consider continued treatment in intensive outpatient programs, which can be highly effective for some people and are less expensive.
Mann also pointed out that this proposal still allows state governments to pay for as much treatment as they think a patient needs, which has been going on all along already.
“The state and the locals are completely free to finance that stay if they think it’s the right place for somebody to be.”
States still have even more power to put together innovative treatment programs to apply for more federal money, so in reality this new campaign is just more assistance being thrown into the mix. The insurance coverage side of getting effective addiction treatment has been a road block for a lot of people to get the help they need, and with the demand growing more organizations are pulling resources to lend a hand in saving lives.
Most full-coverage insurance plans include payments for addiction treatment, but not everyone has this kind of insurance. As the fight against addiction becomes more widely recognized and understood, more elements are changing to provide opportunities for those in need. Palm Partners proudly specializes in holistic healing for drug and alcohol treatment, so if you or someone you love is struggling please call toll-free 1-800-951-6135
The quick answer is Yes! United Healthcare covers drug detox for substance abuse and drug and alcohol dependence.
You may not be aware that many health insurance companies offer coverage for the treatment of drug and alcohol addiction. The good news is that they do. United Healthcare is one of the best health insurance companies that offers comprehensive coverage for substance abuse and addiction. The reason for this is that these are recognized as chronic medical conditions for which treatment is required and has also been shown to be effective.
A drug detox is an important step in the recovery process because an addict or alcoholic simply cannot kick the habit successfully without United Healthcare drug detox. That’s because alcohol withdrawal and withdrawal from drugs like benzodiazepines (benzos) is dangerous and sometimes fatal. In other instances, such as with heroin and other opiates like prescription painkillers, as well as cocaine and crack, the withdrawal symptoms are so uncomfortable and even outright unbearable. This situation often leads the addict to go out and use more simply to avoid these symptoms.
Studies show that people have a better chance at recovery if they first attend a drug and alcohol detox, such as the ones covered by United Health Care. Their lives improve dramatically and it is for this reason that United Healthcare sees the importance of covering treatment for substance abuse, drug dependence, and addiction by providing this often necessary step in the treatment process.
About UHC: Does United Healthcare Cover Drug Detox?
A United Healthcare drug detox program is one that covers medical drug detox accommodations. If you are wondering whether or not your United Healthcare plan will cover drug detox your best bet is to call them up.
United Healthcare has been around since 1977 and has become one of the largest health care providers in the United States. United Healthcare offers diverse healthcare products including group policies, self-insured programs and Medicare subsidizing.
Does United Healthcare Cover Drug Detox and What are the Benefits?
United Healthcare covers detox centers that treat people who are struggling with drug and alcohol dependence. A United Healthcare covered alcohol and drug detox starts with a social history, in which a counselor will gather information from you about your drug use history. You will also be given a drug screen to see which substances are in your system and how much of each are present. All of this information is protected by confidentiality and privacy laws as outlined in HIPAA.
The next step in the process is the actual medical detox, “detox,” where you will be administered certain medications to ease your withdrawal symptoms and your medical condition will be closely monitored by medical staff. The United Healthcare drug detox offers safe haven in order to help you begin your recovery process.
Why United Healthcare Covers Drug Detox
The United Healthcare Insurance Company recognizes that the goal of treatment at a United Healthcare drug detox center is the same as for other any other kind of facilities, which is to help you overcome a chronic medical condition and then lead a life that is free of problems relating to that condition, which in this case is substance abuse and dependence. Specifically, United Healthcare recognizes that drug detox helps you to develop the skills necessary to engage in life-long recovery from drug and alcohol addiction.
Palm Partners does accept health insurance, however, we are not affiliated with United Healthcare Insurance Company. Please give us a call toll-free at 1-800-951-6135 to speak directly with an Admissions Expert for more information. We also have Addictions Specialists available at that number to answer any questions you may have about substance abuse, drug dependence, addiction, and detox programs. Help is available.
I am a person in recovery and was able to go to into a substance abuse treatment facility thanks to my job at the time. I had medical benefits through my employer, which means that I also was covered by something called the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). That piece of legislation allowed me to go to inpatient rehab for my substance abuse and addiction issues without penalty, meaning that I had job security: I couldn’t be fired for getting help.
In fact, I had 3 months of paid leave while I went into a program to save my life. It was a relief knowing that I had the law on my side when I finally decided to face my problem.
I learned a lot about the FMLA through my personal experiences of using it to my benefit. Now, as someone who advocates on behalf of others who are in the same position I was once in – seeking treatment but fearing retribution from their employer, such as dismissal, I found out that the FMLA also covers family members who are taking care of a loved one who is seeking treatment. That is, the FMLA doesn’t just cover the person seeking help but, also any of their family members who may be caring for them or their affairs – such as a grandparent taking care of the patient’s children – while they are in treatment.
This is such an awesome thing. However, for people who identify as gay or lesbian, there wasn’t a guarantee of that extended coverage. Just like with other rights and, especially when it came to medical benefits, same-sex partners were often not recognized as family members. This is the heart of the argument for pro-marriage equality laws. More and more states are adopting laws protecting marriage equality, changing the way things work in a profound way. Namely, who we consider to be “family members” and how they should be covered when it comes to certain benefits.
And now, more groundbreaking changes are taking place – with the FMLA, specifically.
The Labor Department issued a proposed rule Friday stating that any employee is eligible for leave to care for a same-sex spouse under the Family and Medical Leave Act regardless of whether they live in a state that recognizes their marital status.
Since last year’s Supreme Court decision striking down the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, the proposed rule is the latest effort by the Obama administration to extend federal benefits to same-sex couples. The ruling in the case Windsor v. the United States, found that gay couples that were married in states where it’s legal are entitled to receive the same federal health, tax, Social Security and other benefits that heterosexual couples receive.
In almost all instances, same-sex married couples will receive the same federal benefits and obligations as their heterosexual counterparts, regardless of where they live.
Human Rights Campaign spokesman Fred Sainz called the administration’s application of the Windsor decision to federal policy is “easily the largest conferral of rights, benefits and obligations to gay and lesbian Americans in our nation’s history.”
There are two exceptions remaining, which are regarding Social Security and Veterans’ benefits. Currently, these are determined based on the law where individuals live, as opposed to where their marriage took place. The Human Rights Campaign, the American Civil Liberties Union, as well as several other gay and civil rights groups have been pressing lawmakers to extend those federal benefits to same-sex couples.
Labor Secretary Thomas E. Perez said, “The basic promise of the FMLA is that no one should have to choose between succeeding at work and being a loving family caregiver. Under the proposed revisions, the FMLA will be applied to all families equally, enabling individuals in same-sex marriages to fully exercise their rights and fulfill their responsibilities to their families.”
If you or someone you love is struggling with substance abuse and addiction, please call toll-free 1-800-951-6135.